<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beanstalk: New interface for Releases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wildbit.com/blog/2008/10/30/beanstalk-deployment-settings-design-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wildbit.com/blog/2008/10/30/beanstalk-deployment-settings-design-update/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on building web apps, businesses, and virtual teams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 16:40:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Campbell</title>
		<link>http://wildbit.com/blog/2008/10/30/beanstalk-deployment-settings-design-update/comment-page-1/#comment-2551</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 23:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildbit.com/?p=270#comment-2551</guid>
		<description>I must sound like an idiot with my prior post -- but my repository that already has deployments setup lists them as:

Production
Development
Staging

I notice that if I go to setup deployments for another repository, they are in the order you show in your examples. Is this just the because I set these up early in the beta process??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must sound like an idiot with my prior post &#8212; but my repository that already has deployments setup lists them as:</p>
<p>Production<br />
Development<br />
Staging</p>
<p>I notice that if I go to setup deployments for another repository, they are in the order you show in your examples. Is this just the because I set these up early in the beta process??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Campbell</title>
		<link>http://wildbit.com/blog/2008/10/30/beanstalk-deployment-settings-design-update/comment-page-1/#comment-2550</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 23:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildbit.com/?p=270#comment-2550</guid>
		<description>I have always wondered about the order of the servers -- Why Production, then DEV, then Staging? Am I the only one that feels like Staging should be in the middle when these are displayed (Setup pages and Releases page) ?  It just makes from sense from a workflow standpoint.

Love the releases functionality, looking forward to more updates!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always wondered about the order of the servers &#8212; Why Production, then DEV, then Staging? Am I the only one that feels like Staging should be in the middle when these are displayed (Setup pages and Releases page) ?  It just makes from sense from a workflow standpoint.</p>
<p>Love the releases functionality, looking forward to more updates!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Nagele</title>
		<link>http://wildbit.com/blog/2008/10/30/beanstalk-deployment-settings-design-update/comment-page-1/#comment-2546</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Nagele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildbit.com/?p=270#comment-2546</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip! We&#039;ll add this to the backlog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip! We&#8217;ll add this to the backlog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Scott</title>
		<link>http://wildbit.com/blog/2008/10/30/beanstalk-deployment-settings-design-update/comment-page-1/#comment-2545</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildbit.com/?p=270#comment-2545</guid>
		<description>Can the text field for the port be made wider? Our setup requires a 5-digit port number, and it is annoying to have to select/scroll to make sure that we have the right port set up.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can the text field for the port be made wider? Our setup requires a 5-digit port number, and it is annoying to have to select/scroll to make sure that we have the right port set up.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

